Spiderman is in The Great Gatsby

-
So, today I saw the new The Great Gatsby movie, to which I say "eh". I love the novel, but the movie version of The Great Gatsby sort of disappointed me. Sure, the movie was really cool from a visual standpoint, but it wasn't The Great Gatsby as it was written.

They really took the substance out of the story and made it one long frat party, set to hip-hop music. Which didn't make a lot of sense to me, given that The Great Gatsby is supposed to be set in the 1920s. Apparently, no one told Baz Luhrmann. The problem with his adaptation is that Luhrmann was so heavy handed with the story. I mean, if the metaphors were any more obvious, they would jump out of the screen and beat you over the head with a herring.

However, all those things are forgivable. What was not forgivable was the casting of Tobey Maguire as Nick Carraway. I say that not because his acting was bad, but because there is no place for Spider-Man in The Great Gatsby. Seriously, that was practically all I could think about the entire movie. It was like, "look, Spider-Man is getting drunk", "look, Spider-Man and Jack Dawson are going to the beach; maybe next, they'll team up and save the Titanic". Every minute, I was expecting Leonardo DiCaprio to turn into the Green Goblin and have it out with Nick Carraway over Mary Jane/ Daisy Buchanan. That's because Tobey Maguire is sort of one of those actors that you will only ever associate with a single role. It would have been better if they cast a less recognizable actor for the role.

Speaking of Nick Carraway's role; I wasn't happy that Luhrmann decided to make him the author of The Great Gatsby. It was unneccessary framing to give the story a meaning that, if the producers had followed the original text, it would have already had.

However, it wasn't all bad. There were some good parts: Gatsby's lawn had some lovely turf.

Just readin'

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Noa Noa: Paul Gauguin & Romanticism

-
Image
Paul Gauguin is one of my favorite painters. (Actually, as I write this, there is a print of his painting  Mahana No Atua hanging next to me on my bedroom wall.) So, during my winter break, I decided to read his Tahitian journal, Noa Noa . Noa Noa is a travelogue written by Gauguin, first published in 1901. Although, Gauguin billed the book as his genuine experiences, it seems pretty clear to me and other critics that it's mostly fictional or exaggerated. That being said, I found the book to be very interesting. From a narrative perspective, Noa Noa is a bit dull. Gauguin's writing style has a tendency to be wordy and pedantic. However, from an ideological perspective it's quite interesting. To my mind, Gauguin is an excellent example of Romanticism and Romantic thought. If you don't know, Romanticism was an artistic and ideological movement that reacted against the Enlightenment. Romantics believed that the world could not be understood purely though the lens
Read more

Fascinating Characters: Kate, Henry IV Part I

-
Image
Not gonna lie, I'm not a big fan of Henry IV. Everyone's always trying to tell me "but blah blah blah Falstaff", "but blah blah blah power politics" and I'm like "eh, cool story bro". But one scene from this play has always fascinated me: Act II, Scene III. This scene is unique in the play, not only is it the only scene to include a woman (at least a woman who actually has lines) but because it gives us a unique glimpse into domestic life and issues of gender. That one speaking female character is Lady Percy, also known as Kate (although her real life counterpart's name was Elizabeth). Kate is a woman in a man's world. As her husband, Henry Percy, Hotspur, famously says: ...this is no world / To play with mammets [dolls] and to tilt with lips: / We must have bloody noses and crack'd crowns... -William Shakespeare But what is interesting about Kate is the way she attempts to resist this world centered on patriarchy. She is
Read more